PhilArchive
open access
Building Plans as Natural Symbols
Carroll William Westfall has claimed that building types can serve as natural symbols of (the purposes served by) activities such as venerating, celebrating, trading, and dwelling. The aim of this paper is to interpret Westfall’s claim in a way that makes it non-trivial and yet worthy of further investigation. In particular, an attempt is made to explain the connection between building types and what they symbolize without appealing to convention. The question is also answered whether a non-conventional connection is compatible with one and the same building type having a different significance in different cultures.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Development Of Emotional-Cultural Design Framework (Ecdf) For Interior Space With Special Emphasis On The New Chinese Decorative Style#220235
- Poiesis, ecology and embodied cognition#83300
- Analysis of architectural design styles in the spaces of world leaders from the West to the East, as well as the Albanian case#80942
- Interior architecture: The evolution of a discipline#376543
- Architectural Atmospheres in Álvaro Siza’s Written Work: Reading Atmosphere with Gernot Böhme#719829
Record · ID 718880
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive