PhilArchive
open access
The "Artificial Mathematician" Objection: Exploring the (Im)possibility of Automating Mathematical Understanding
Reuben Hersh confided to us that, about forty years ago, the late Paul Cohen predicted to him that at some unspecified point in the future, mathematicians would be replaced by computers. Rather than focus on computers replacing mathematicians, however, our aim is to consider the (im)possibility of human mathematicians being joined by “artificial mathematicians” in the proving practice—not just as a method of inquiry but as a fellow inquirer.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Graduate Mathematics in the Age of AI: Forming Mathematicians for Original, Independent, and Responsible Inquiry#1037574
- Cracking the Millennium Prize Problems: A Meta-Logical Approach to Mathematical Mysteries#83738
- Computers will not acquire general intelligence, but may still rule the world#105555
- Artificial Intelligence - Curse or Blessing? Historical Analysis of Digital Developments up to the First European Law on Artificial Intelligence (AI-Act)#1176592
- Navigating the AI crisis: a humble guide for students#974968
Record · ID 719315
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive