PhilArchive
open access
What Quine (and Carnap) might say about contemporary metaphysics of time
This chapter explores some of the relations between Quine’s and Carnap’s metaontological stances on the one hand, and contemporary work in the metaphysics of time, on the other. Contemporary metaphysics of time, like analytic metaphysics in general, grew out of the revival of the discipline that Quine’s critique of the logical empiricists (such as Carnap) made possible. At the same time, the metaphysics of time has, in some respects, strayed far from its Quinean roots. This chapter examines some likely Quinean and Carnapian reactions to elements of the contemporary scene.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Carnap’s epistemological critique of metaphysics#702760
- Quine's theorizing about theories#705101
- The Impossibility of an Actually Infinite Future: A Theory-Neutral Argument from Structural Incoherence#222022
- The Pre-Registered Afterlife: A Metamethodology of Functional-Transition Design in Falsifiable Frameworks, With Four Historical Cases#687482
- Carnap and Quine on Sense and Nonsense#84692
Record · ID 719493
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive