PhilArchive
open access
Margaret Cavendish and Thomas Hobbes on Freedom, Education, and Women
In this paper, I argue that Margaret Cavendish’s account of freedom, and the role of education in freedom, is better able to account for the specifics of women’s lives than are Thomas Hobbes’ accounts of these topics. The differences between the two is grounded in their differing conceptions of the metaphysics of human nature, though the full richness of Cavendish’s approach to women, their minds and their freedom can be appreciated only if we take account of her plays, accepting them as philosophical texts alongside her more standard philosophical treatises.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Towards a Feminist Philosophy of Education#87772
- De la liberté académique. A propos de Academic Freedom, de David M. Rabban#229848
- Those around the Corner: Sexual Difference and the Cartography of ReXistence#109775
- Karen Ng, Hegel's Concept of Life: Self-Consciousness, Freedom, Logic#118186
- Education as a field of contention: feminist and anti-gender struggles over democracy#403975
Record · ID 719677
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive