PhilArchive
open access
Who's Afraid of Charles Sanders Peirce? Knocking Some Critical Common Sense into Moral Philosophy
In this essay I explore the potential contribution of Peirce's theory of scientific inquiry to moral philosophy. After a brief introduction, I outline Peirce's theory of inquiry. Next, I address why Peirce believed that this theory of inquiry is inapplicable to what he called "matters of vital importance," the latter including genuine moral problems. This leaves us in the end with two options: We can try to develop an alternative way of addressing moral problems or we can seek to reconcile moral problems with scientific inquiry as described by Peirce. Though Peirce seems to argue for the former, I argue for the latter.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- C. S. Peirce: la vita della scienza e il desiderio di apprendere#742213
- Does Scientific Progress Consist in Increasing Knowledge or Understanding?#766926
- Dangerous Dilemmas: Startling but True#59257
- Science Communication and the Problematic Impact of Descriptive Norms#98902
- Agitating for Munificence or Going Out of Business: Philosophy’s Dilemma#735593
Record · ID 719765
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive