PhilArchive
open access
Progress in Ethics: Out of the Ivory Tower
How is progress in the academic discipline of ethics related to improvements in people's ethical thoughts and behaviours? We propose that there is disciplinary ethical progress on some phenomenon to the extent that the discipline puts people in a position to increase their understanding of that phenomenon. Even though progress, thus construed, does not guarantee improved thoughts and behaviours, progressive ethical theorising nonetheless enables these improvements. Our account thus has the resources with which to substantiate and shed light on concerns that academic work in ethics is too isolated, obtuse, or trivial.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Normative Ethics Does Not Need a Foundation: It Needs More Science#762076
- Ethics in the Field#419799
- Ethics in the Discipline(s) of Bioethics#738787
- Bioethics and large-scale biobanking: individualistic ethics and collective projects#777194
- Bridging the Gap Between Aristotle's Science and Ethics#739617
Record · ID 719958
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive