PhilArchive
open access
Should We Read Herman Bavinck’s The Philosophy of Revelation as an Apologetics of Despair
In dealing with arguments against the Christian faith in his book The Philosophy of Religion, Herman Bavinck uses a series of argumentative strategies. One of these strategies is the apologetic of despair. This study tries to fi gure out whether this strategy tends to be observed in most essays of the book or its use is only circumstantial.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Resistencia al Poder: Zeferino González on Aquinas’s View on Insurgence#92833
- Revelation, Negative Theology, and Apophasis: Marion and Eriugena on the Incomprehensibility of Revelation#112550
- Robert E. and Bonnie Cone Hooper Plenary: Christian Scholarship: Personal Reflections on Surrendering to God's Call#679647
- Disagreement and the value of reflection#767922
- Kierkegaard, Adler and the Communication of Revelation#747617
Record · ID 720704
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive