PhilArchive
open access
The Burning Bush
In this paper, I present some ruminations on Hume's argument from miracles and the distorted view of rationality that it reflects (along with religious skepticism generally) contrasting it with what I take to be a better account of rationality, one more sympathetic - at least less hostile - to religious claims.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Hume on testimony to the miraculous#747169
- Of Miracles and Evidential Probability: Hume’s “Abject Failure” Vindicated#774805
- Hume's Abject Failure: The Argument Against Miracles#745934
- Two (Failed) Versions of Hume's Argument Against Miracles#696458
- Naturalism and Wonder: Peirce on the Logic of Hume's Argument Against Miracles#110929
Record · ID 721522
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive