PhilArchive
open access
HUMAN RIGHTS+: To Serve Justice, One Must Start Seeing
This monograph introduces the Human Rights+ (HR+) framework, an expanded theoretical model for understanding how modern institutions fail to recognize and respond to certain forms of harm. The work proposes that many contemporary injustices are not defined by physical violence or overt discrimination, but by invisibility: harm that exists yet is not acknowledged within the categorical limits of human rights, law, and policy. The framework identifies three interrelated constructs—Invisible Harm, Harm Attribution Gaps (HAGs), and Institutional Harm—and unites them through the principle of Perceptual Justice, defined as the moral and procedural capacity of institutions to see, attribute, and act upon harm before it becomes normalized. Drawing from the theoretical traditions of Galtung’s structural violence, Sen’s capabilities approach, and Freyd’s institutional betrayal theory, HR+ develops a language for diagnosing systemic failures of recognition in both bureaucratic and digital systems. Through conceptual synthesis and qualitative analysis, the monograph argues that the moral legitimacy of modern institutions depends not only on what rights they protect, but on their perceptual ability to recognize emergent harms.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Human Rights+ Framework: Integrating Invisible Harm, Harm Attribution Gaps, and Institutional Harm for Perceptual Justice#101761
- The Human Rights+ Framework: Understanding Harm Attribution Gaps and Invisible Harm in the Digital Age#107502
- Human Rights+: Closing Invisible Harm — Recognizing and Repairing Harm Attribution Gaps in Human Rights Systems#78648
- Harm Attribution Gaps: Institutional Classification and the Upstream Failure of Rights Recognition#108868
- Pluralist Sufficiency and the Problem of Institutional Recognition#204111
Record · ID 721796
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive