PhilArchive
open access
Constitutional Foundations of the New Constitutionalism of the 21st Century Incompleteness, Hidden Variables, and the New Ulysses: A Theory of Constitutional Law for the Cryptographic Era
This essay proposes a constitutional theory of cyberspace founded on three structural theses. The incompleteness thesis holds that the positivized legal system, like any sufficiently expressive axiomatic system, is subject to Gödel’s theorems: its validity cannot be derived from itself, requiring non-derivable foundations — human dignity, liberty, legal principles in the Dworkinian sense. The hidden variables thesis, constructed through a heuristic translation of Bell’s theorem into legal reasoning, argues that the State cannot formulate positive normative claims about that which it does not observe — the private sphere, subjective content, the cryptographic transaction — without producing systematic “local inequalities,” violations that undermine the validity of the legal order itself; in this plane, the German Schranken-schranken finds its ultimate epistemic ground. The new Ulysses thesis, inspired by Jon Elster, proposes that the citizen of cyberspace voluntarily binds himself through code and cryptography, performing an individual constitutional pre-commitment that operates beneath the State and completes the Hobbes-Locke-Rousseau sequence with a fourth moment: from civil state to cyberspace as a new state of nature voluntarily chosen. In dialogue with Habermas, Luhmann, Teubner, Ladeur, Canaris, Alexy, Tribe, Endicott, Taleb, and the cypherpunk tradition of Diffie, Hellman, Chaum, Back, Finney, Szabo, Dai, and Nakamoto, the essay argues that blockchain, tokenization, and public-key cryptography are not neutral technical phenomena but material constitutional acts — reaffirmations of the fundamental rights that the people, as the principle and end of constitutional norms, reserved for themselves before delegating any portion of sovereignty to the Leviathan. Keywords: constitutional law; transconstitutionalism; Gödel; Bell; pre-commitment; Schranken-schranken; cryptography; blockchain; constitutional mutation; cyberspace.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Failing Subject: A Diagnosis of Legal Personhood for a Multi-Entity World#732677
- Sophistic Criticisms of the Rule of Law. A Comparison of Callicles and Thrasymachus#745650
- Human Rights and the Forgotten Acts of Meaning in the Social Conventions of Conceptual Jurisprudence#711772
- Metamodernism and the Question of Privacy and Confidentiality in the Digital Age#93152
- Laws of encryption: An emerging legal framework#444208
Record · ID 721863
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive