PhilArchive
open access
Who's afraid of a non-adaptable constitution?
Joseph Raz criticizes John Rawls for a procedure supporting a non-adaptable constitution. This paper considers how a non-adaptable constitution can seem not so counterintuitive and also when.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Rationing the Constitution: Beyond and Below#1169545
- Puzzles from Joseph Raz’s obituary of H.L.A. Hart#110485
- Raz on Reasons, Reason, and Rationality: On Raz's From Normativity to Responsibility#710388
- The Problems with the Burdens of Judgment#741307
- What Can Historicising Rawls Achieve?#729843
Record · ID 721908
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive