PhilArchive
open access
Slop is Human
AI slop is typically framed as a machine pathology, but this essay argues it is a human one that language models have merely industrialised. Drawing on Frankfurt's account of bullshit, Hicks et al.'s application of it to ChatGPT, and empirical work on AI-detection bias, the essay shows that AI slop functions as a status judgment mistaken for a quality judgment - policing authorship rather than truth, and revealing what institutional writing was already failing to enforce.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Is it Cake or is it AI? A Systematic Review of Human Uncertainty in Distinguishing Generative Artificial Intelligence Content#16470
- Bias in Large Language Models: Origin, Evaluation, and Mitigation#189222
- The Psychological Reality of Syntactic Principles#111712
- Measuring susceptibility: A benchmark for conspiracy theory adherence in large language models#361943
- An Empirical Analysis of AI Slop in Music Streaming#282719
Record · ID 722208
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive