PhilArchive
open access
Humour is subjective versus Addison and Kundera
This paper considers a response to the claim that humour is subjective, as meant by the average undergraduate. The claim conveys that different individuals find different things funny and that there is no fact of the matter which determines one party to be right. I present a response from Milan Kundera, which seems much influenced by Joseph Addison, albeit perversely so: when these people appear to be laughing at something else, they are not even laughing.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Slipping on banana skins and falling through bars: 'True' comedy and the comic character#701870
- Estudio comparativo de la traducción del humor presente en el doblaje audiovisual del inglés al alemán y al español de la serie Disenchantment.#396788
- La creatividad en el dominio del humor :#309575
- Self- Deprecation and the Habit of Laughter#117743
- Incongruity and Seriousness#746144
Record · ID 722241
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive