PhilArchive
open access
Quotation and Unquotation in Free Indirect Discourse
I argue that free indirect discourse should be analyzed as a species of direct discourse rather than indirect discourse. More specifically, I argue against the emerging consensus among semanticists, who analyze it in terms of context shifting. Instead, I apply the semantic mechanisms of mixed quotation and unquotation to offer an alternative analysis where free indirect discourse is essentially a quotation of an utterance or thought, but with unquoted tenses and pronouns
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Quotation Marks and Kinds of Meaning. Arguments in Favor of a Pragmatic Account#770873
- The pragmatics of attraction: Explaining unquotation in direct and free indirect discourse#750551
- Discourse and method#757399
- The Abstract Form Hypothesis: Dissolving the Abstract-Concrete Distinction through Linguistic Pragmatics#119546
- Vagrant Voices: Summary, Citation, Authority#118454
Record · ID 722267
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive