PhilArchive
open access
Evidential monism, evidential pluralism, or evidential contextualism? An introduction to evidential diversity in the social sciences
Social scientists often draw on a variety of evidence for their causal inferences. There is also a call to use a greater variety of evidence in social science research. This topical collection examines the philosophical foundations and implications of evidential diversity in the social sciences. It assesses the application of Evidential Pluralism in the context of the social sciences, especially its application to economics and political science. It also discusses the concept of causation in cognitive science and the implications of evidential diversity for the social sciences.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluating evidential pluralism in epidemiology: mechanistic evidence in exposome research#707839
- Rational monism and rational pluralism#769702
- Precis of Evidential Pluralism in the Social Sciences#97246
- Sceptical theism and evidential arguments from evil#116284
- A Cumulative Case Argument for Infallibilism#711282
Record · ID 722480
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive