Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

The Extracted Dasein,Beyond the Victim–Perpetrator Binary Toward a Clinical Ontology of Gendered Human Capacity

Zohrevandi, Talaye · 2026
PhilArchive · Papers · 2026
Open Source ↗
philosophy
Contemporary accounts of gendered suffering tend to organize clinical and ethical analysis around a victimperpetrator binary, in which one party is positioned as the injured recipient of power and another as its intentional agent. This distinction remains indispensable for questions of accountability, yet it under-specifies a deeper existential process: the progressive consumption, within gendered social arrangements, of the finite capacities through which persons sustain agency, reinterpret experience, regulate exposure, and revise their developmental trajectory. Drawing on Heideggerian daseinsanalysis (Boss, 1963, 1979; Binswanger, 1963) and its clinical elaboration in existential psychotherapy (Yalom, 1980; van Deurzen, 2010; Spinelli, 2007), together with Niami's ontology of finite continuance (Niami, 2026a, 2026b, 2026f), this article develops the concept of the Extracted Dasein as a clinical-ontological construct that supplements, rather than replaces, the victim–perpetrator distinction. We define gendered extraction as the structured consumption of temporal, attentional, affective, bodily, interpretive, relational, economic, and reflective capacity through relational, institutional, symbolic, and economic arrangements, at a rate that progressively narrows a subject's capacity for reflection and future self-reconfiguration. Five interlocking constructs are introduced: capacity debt, asymmetrical permeability (the Dynamic Mask), sedimented gendered determination (the Automatic Mask), Responsible Suspension as a temporal interruption of premature identity closure, and the Threshold of Sufficiency as the point at which reconfigurative capacity becomes clinically compromised. We argue that gender is best approached, within a daseinsanalytic frame, not as a fixed essence or purely discursive performance but as a historically sedimented distribution of world-openness — of who is permitted time, withdrawal, opacity, and the right to remain unfinished. A composite clinical vignette illustrates how the framework reorganizes case formulation without dissolving individual or institutional responsibility. Anticipating the objection that these constructs may merely relabel established findings, we systematically differentiate each proposed construct from its nearest existing analog — capacity debt from burnout (Maslach & Jackson, 1981), the Extracted Dasein from learned helplessness (Seligman, 1975), Responsible Suspension from experiential avoidance (Hayes et al., 1996), the Automatic Mask from internalized gender schema (Bem, 1981), the Threshold of Sufficiency from allostatic load and distress tolerance (McEwen, 1998; Simons & Gaher, 2005), and livable possibility from perceived self-efficacy (Bandura, 1997) — and against the nearest macro-level theory, Sen and Nussbaum’s capability approach (Sen, 1999; Nussbaum, 2000), specifying in each case a discriminant-validity test the framework must pass to justify its claim to novelty. We furthershow that, although the integrative ontology itself remains untested, its component mechanisms already have convergent support in independent empirical literatures on gendered cognitive and domestic labor (Bianchi et al., 2000; Daminger, 2019; Offer & Schneider, 2011), the experimental scarcity paradigm (Mani, Mullainathan, Shafir, & Zhao, 2013), the neurobiology of chronic stress (Arnsten, 2009), and predictors of remaining in abusive relationships despite recognized harm (Anderson & Saunders, 2003; Kim & Gray, 2008; Postmus et al., 2012). The article closes with this convergent evidence base, a measurement roadmap for operationalizing capacity via existing validated instruments, falsifiable propositions for future empirical work, an explicit statement of the framework's conceptual status and limitations, and a normative criterion — the Ethics of Sufficiency — for evaluating when gendered relations and clinical interventions preserve enough capacity for a subject to remain capable of becoming oth
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 722672
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive