PhilArchive
open access
Is Morality Natural or Supernatural?
The author argues that morality is best understood as a natural human system rather than a supernatural one. By comparing moral rules with traffic regulations, it shows that features often deemed metaphysically puzzling—normativity, fact dependence, categorical force, universality and virtue—arise naturally from the practical need to coordinate behaviour for mutual benefit. Morality, like traffic control, forms an integrated system of aims, rules, roles, virtues and sanctions. Recognizing its natural origins dissolves the need for supernatural grounding and clarifies why moral norms carry authority within human communities.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Norms and conventions#769604
- The Limits of Virtue Ethics#773113
- The Morality in Intimacy#74751
- A Brief (Nihilistic) Theory of Morality#773803
- Filosofia moral e busca definicional na Ethica Nicomachea de Aristóteles : uma leitura de EN I.1-7 à luz dos Segundos Analíticos#760029
Record · ID 722689
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive