PhilArchive
open access
Moral fictionalism: How to have your cake and eat it too
The moral error theorist faces the question of what we should do with moral discourse, once it has been decided that it is flawed. Three candidate answers are fictionalism, conservationism, and abolitionism. This paper defends fictionalism by comparing it, in turn, with the other two rivals.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Keeping track of your trolleys: origins and destinations#1056626
- Fictionalism: Morality and Metaphor#94009
- Subjectivist cosmopolitanism and the morality of intervention#82313
- Andrew F. Smith, A Critique of the Moral Defense of Vegetarianism. Reviewed by#711283
- Fictionalising Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Strong Legal Fictionalism#1177728
Record · ID 722722
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive