PhilArchive
open access
Purity is linked to cooperation but not necessarily through self-control
Fitouchi et al. claim that seemingly victimless pleasures and nonproductive activities are moralized because they alter self-control. Their account predicts that: (1) victimless excesses are negatively moralized because they diminish self-control, and (2) restrained behaviors are positively moralized because they enhance self-control. Several examples run contrary to these predictions and call into question the general relationship between self-control and cooperation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Hawthorne Effect Through the Mindfulness Lens: A Multidimensional Typology of Observation and Its Implications for Human Performance#91835
- Modeling Extravagant Human Behavior under the Three Universal Laws of Nature#87105
- Is self-regulation a burden or a virtue? A comparative perspective#765521
- Differentiating Social and Moral Norms in Perceived Internalization.#232155
- Differentiating social and moral norms in perceived internalization#134359
Record · ID 722789
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive