PhilArchive
open access
Kant and the Debate on Aristotle’s Categories in the Nineteenth Century
The debate about Aristotle’s categories in the 19th century is largely a reaction to Kant’s criticisms of the Aristotelian theory of categories. Scholars tried both to interpret Aristotle’s texts and to defend the Stagirite from the accusation of collecting the categories in a rhapsodic way. Starting from this well-known historiographical assumption, I aim to show that Kant not only criticized but also provided an interpretation of the Aristotelian theory of categories and that the interpretations of nineteenth-century scholars (Trendelenburg, Bonitz, Brentano, Apelt, and others), while intending to respond to Kant, move largely within the conceptual framework outlined by Kant, contain Kantian elements or develop hints provided by Kant.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Aristotle's Metaphysics. Volume I. Textual Criticism#95813
- Fred D. Miller, Jr.: ‘Alexander’: On Aristotle Metaphysics 12#85705
- Dual Categorization and the Role of Aristotle’s Categories#763010
- Hegel and the Modern Canon#738974
- Aristotelian vs. Contemporary Perspectives on Relations#703283
Record · ID 722884
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive