PhilArchive
open access
An Evolutionary Account of Guilt?
. Grant Ramsey and Michael Deem argue that appreciating the role that empathy plays in posttransgression guilt leads to a more promising account of the emotion’s evolutionary origins. But because their proposal fails to adequately distinguish guilt from shame, we cannot say which of the two emotions we are actually getting an evolutionary account of. Moreover, a closer look at the details suggests both that empathy may be more relevant for our understanding of shame’s evolutionary origins than guilt’s, and that guilt is unlikely to be an adaptation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Debunking Challenge to Realism: How Evolution (Ultimately) Matters#117381
- Aap zoekt zin. Waarom wij bewustzijn, vrije wil, cultuur en religie hebben. ISVW, 2014 (Ape / Monkey Seeks Meaning: Why We Have Consciousness, Free Will, Culture, and Religion”)2014):#768730
- Grace and Alienation#778274
- Sin as a Burden of Consciousness: An Ontological, Ethical, and Phenomenological Analysis#73715
- The evolution of testimony: Receiver vigilance, speaker honesty and the reliability of communication#753499
Record · ID 722941
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive