PhilArchive
open access
When Continuation Fails Without Stopping
Processes can persist while failing to support their own continuation. In such cases, states remain observable, yet no longer function as conditions for further unfolding. This paper argues against the claim that persistence, regularity, and indefinite extension suffice for continuation. It isolates a condition under which what is ordinarily taken as continuation can fail, and identifies a boundary beyond which that condition becomes unstable and fails. A minimal counterexample shows that a process may remain stable, regular, and indefinitely extended while no longer sustaining further development. The result is a constraint on when continuation is available.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Turbulence Admissibility: Constraint Compatibility in Turbulent Fluid Systems#106952
- Why Potential Is Not Probability but Unclosed Continuation Tension#204043
- The Selection Gap: What Petri Nets Add to the Freedom Proof#725070
- Polynomial Invariants for Probabilistic Transition Systems with Unbounded Support#924328
- Polynomial Invariants for Probabilistic Transition Systems with Unbounded Support#920097
Record · ID 723708
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive