PhilArchive
open access
Fragmenting the Paradox of Material Constitution
This paper brings fragmentalism to bear on the Paradox of Material Constitution. It begins by outlining a fragmentalist metametaphysics before presenting the Paradox and considering two fragmentalist solutions. The first solution identifies constituted objects with their constitutors. I argue that it does not work. The second solution is a fragmentalist version of standard constitution theory. I argue in favour of this theory.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Materiality, Parthood, and Possibility#111965
- Materialism and the logical structure of intentionality#700076
- Marking the Seam - What a Sentence Is Doing#696303
- The False Debate of Physicalism: Why the Opposition between Reductionism and Non-Reductionism Misses Its Object#731124
- Natural Kind Essentialism Revisited#772104
Record · ID 723877
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive