PhilArchive
open access
How could a perennialist argument for God be developed?
Roughly, metaphysical perennialism is the thesis that the great religious traditions converge upon a shared set of core metaphysical claims. Without getting into all of the different strands of perennialism available, there has been very little written on how one can reason to God from perennialist truths. This paper sketches out how one could go about reasoning to God from perennial truths. Toward the end of the paper, I raise an important objection to perennialist style arguments and argue that perennialists are not without a response.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Does religious belief impact philosophical analysis?#773162
- Is theology respectable as metaphysics?#743276
- Metaethics and Its Discontents: A Case Study of Korsgaard#741288
- Essays on God and Freud#45020
- Foundational Facts and Doctrinal Change#648372
Record · ID 724796
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive