PhilArchive
open access
Epistemic Authority
This handbook article gives a critical overview of recent discussions of epistemic authority. It favors an account that brings into balance the dictates of rational deference with the ideals of intellectual self-governance. A plausible starting point is the conjecture that neither should rational deference to authorities collapse into total epistemic submission, nor the ideal of mature intellectual self-governance be conflated with (illusions of) epistemic autarky.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Responsibility to Reflect: Reflection as Epistemic Responsibility in Democracy#699418
- What epistemologists talk about when they talk about reflection#768054
- The Authority Resolution Framework: A Five-Domain Ontology for Governing Who and What Decides, at Scale#616965
- The Authority Resolution Framework: A Five-Domain Ontology for Governing Who and What Decides, at Scale#616465
- The Governance of Complexity and the Complexity of Governance, Revisited.#1039335
Record · ID 725387
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive