PhilArchive
open access
The Battlefield After the Drone: Resilient Algorithmic Kill Chains and the Future of Autonomous Warfare
The Ukraine war has been widely read as evidence that drones and autonomous weapons are transforming combat. This paper argues that the more consequential and durable transformation lies elsewhere: in the resilience of the algorithmic "kill chains", the integrated sequences of sensing, data processing, artificial-intelligence-enabled interpretation, decision-making, communication, navigation and action, that make individual platforms militarily useful. Drawing on 2026 primary and analytical sources on the Ukraine and Russia conflict, NATO and U.S. military-AI adoption, and the emerging academic literature on human-machine governance, the paper develops a conceptual framework in which resilience, not autonomy, is the organizing variable of future warfare. It examines the Ukraine war as a live laboratory for functional, incremental autonomy; analyzes the "AI triad" of data, algorithms and compute and the ways an adversary can attack each without ever defeating the underlying model; traces the shift from centralized, cloud-dependent AI toward distributed, edge-based "resilient autonomy"; and introduces the concept of the battlefield learning loop, in which combat experience is converted into model improvement at a pace that itself becomes a source of advantage. A comparative discussion of Russian and Ukrainian/NATO adaptation strategies is followed by an analysis of human control, accountability and escalation risk under machine-speed conditions. The paper concludes that the decisive military technology of the coming decade is unlikely to be the most capable individual model or platform, but the architecture that continues to sense, decide and act when an adversary is actively trying to break it.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Methodology for Auditable Trustworthiness Levels in AI Lifecycle Governance#1052238
- Advanced Technologies and Battlefield Transformation: A Legal and Ethical Reading of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict#695870
- The Main Problems of Robotpolitics. Suggestions for Their Resolution#687988
- OntoOmnia : A Comprehensive Ethical and Governance Architecture for AI and Sociotechnical Systems#88040
- DEMOCRACY 2076: A Futurist's Design for Self-Governance in the Age of AGI, Cognitive Warfare, and Conscious Capitalism#733543
Record · ID 725581
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive