PhilArchive
open access
Explaining Deontic Status by Good Reasoning
This paper offers an account of deontic normativity in terms of attributive goodness. An action is permissible for S in C just in case there is a good practical inference available to S in C that results in S performing (or intending to perform) the action. The standards of goodness for practical inferences are determined by what is a good or bad exercise of the human capacity of practical reason, which is an attributive (and not a deontic) assessment.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Subjective Moral Biases & Fallacies: Developing Scientifically & Practically Adequate Moral Analogues of Cognitive Heuristics & Biases#739819
- Elusive Reasons and the Motivational Constraint#764010
- The Jurisdiction of Explanation: Why ``Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing?'' Misfires#714358
- Does Sufficient Explanation Require Determination? Contrastive Closure, Agent-Inclusive Explanation, and Practical Authorship#688219
- Against the 'First' Views (formerly Not fittingness, not reasons, not value) [Chapter 5 of _A New Theory of Pragmatic Reasons for Belief_ (Under Contract with OUP)]#726458
Record · ID 725596
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive