PhilArchive
open access
Defence of Any Donkey Could against (anticipated critics
This paper presents some defences of my new book “Any Donkey Could? Amusing essays on Western culture before the 20th century.” I focus on the omission of Jane Austen, John Stuart Mill in favour of Sidgwick, and the focus on Frazer, an anthropologist who wrote for the general public but did not ever pursue the method we associate with social anthropology, even in a light form: fieldwork on so-called primitive peoples.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Viking age in Denmark#976650
- Haslanger, Sally. Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Pp. 490. $99.00#697439
- L. Polo, Approach to Transcendental Anthropology#718206
- Die 33 wichtigsten Narrative aus Geschichte und Politik : Wie Mythen, Dogmen und Legenden unsere Wahrnehmung steuern, 11 / Frank Röder#1119572
- Luigi Filieri and Sofie Møller (eds), Kant on Freedom and Human Nature. New York: Routledge, 2024 Pp. xiv + 274 ISBN 9781032195087 (hbk) $180.00#700306
Record · ID 725952
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive