PhilArchive
open access
COGITO. A Methodological Framework for Structuring Human–AI Cognitive Interaction
The rapid integration of large language models and generative artificial intelligence into cognitive, analytical, and decision-making practices raises a set of epistemic challenges that extend beyond issues of accuracy or reliability. In particular, human–AI interaction increasingly exhibits risks of cognitive delegation, erosion of epistemic agency, and uncritical acceptance of machine-generated outputs, especially in contexts requiring methodological rigor and accountability. This paper introduces COGITO, a methodological framework designed to govern human–AI cognitive interaction through explicit constraints, role separation, and process-aware regulation. Rather than proposing an ethical theory or a normative model of artificial intelligence, COGITO operates as a meta-method: it structures how cognitive tasks are approached, articulated, and validated when AI systems are involved. The framework distinguishes cognitive regimes (rigorous versus exploratory), enforces explicit identification of cognitive phases, and embeds mechanisms for self-verification and procedural stability, thereby preserving human responsibility and decision-making authority. COGITO is grounded in the assumption that epistemic quality in human–AI collaboration does not emerge automatically from technological sophistication but depends on the deliberate design of interactional conditions. By formalizing these conditions, the framework aims to prevent gradual epistemic drift, opacity, and methodological degradation over extended analytical processes. The paper argues that COGITO contributes to contemporary debates in the philosophy of technology by reframing human–AI interaction as a problem of epistemic governance rather than optimization. It offers a transferable methodological perspective applicable across academic, professional, and policy-oriented contexts, where artificial intelligence functions as a cognitive instrument rather than an autonomous epistemic agent.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Engineering Shared Answerability: Design Primitives for Answerable Control#167397
- Artificial Intelligence, Control and Legitimacy#114331
- Why Human–AI “Collaboration” Is a Category Error#732921
- Artificial World Constitution and the Transcendental Remainder: Finite Artificial Cognition and Institutional Audit#688931
- Structural Responsibility in AI Systems: The Creator-Creation Asymmetry as Epistemic Foundation of Human Accountability#240795
Record · ID 726050
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive