PhilArchive
open access
操作哲学 (Operable Philosophy)
This work presents Operable Philosophy, a systematic philosophical framework designed to ground human cognition and decision-making in the physical constraints of the universe. Beginning with a single axiom—to be is to be distinguishable—it deduces, rather than asserts, a complete system for understanding the interaction between consciousness and the world. The framework argues that traditional "ought" philosophies (from Plato to Kant to Hegel) are structurally untestable and have historically collapsed when confronted with physical reality. In their place, it proposes a testable, self-terminating system anchored in three physical givens: entropy, the Landauer principle, and the principle of least action. From these, it derives four interconnected analytical tools: (1) the M-I Co-Flow model, which treats any system—from a person to a civilization—as an indivisible coupling of matter and information; (2) the finite observer principle, which rejects all claims to absolute or God-like knowledge; (3) the criterion of truth-as-penalty-avoidance, which holds that a proposition is provisionally true if acting upon it does not result in physical or social punishment; and (4) the Three-Track Analysis, a decision-making protocol that evaluates any plan through logical, social, and physical consequences before action is taken. The system is designed to be falsifiable: if any axiom is proven inconsistent, the entire framework invalidates itself. Written in an accessible style and released as an open-source document, the book explicitly invites readers to use AI to replicate its derivations and test its claims. It does not prescribe what to live for, but provides tools for finite observers to avoid dying before they find out.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Free Will After Determinism: Why Agency Survives the Limits of Predictability#725231
- A New Reading of The Second Analogy: The Nomologically Determined Object View#707484
- Free will and (in)determinism in the brain: a case for naturalized philosophy#775409
- Rational Theism, Part One: An A Priori Proof in God's Existence, Omniscient and Omnipotent (A Science of Metaphysics in answer to the challenge of Immanuel Kant)#92678
- Self-Pertinent Volition: Beyond Determinism and Free Will#704714
Record · ID 726064
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive