PhilArchive
open access
Reframing the Prisoner's Dilemma: A Comparative Analysis of Classical Game Theory and Universal Laws of Cooperation
Abstract The Prisoner's Dilemma (PD) is a foundational concept in game theory, illustrating the conflict between individual rationality and collective benefit. This paper presents a comparative analysis between the classical game theory approach and a novel framework based on three universal laws: the Law of Karma, the Law of Balance in Nature, and the Law of Feedback Mechanisms. By integrating these laws into the PD model, we aim to demonstrate how they provide a more holistic understanding of cooperation and conflict resolution.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond the Prisoner's Dilemma: Coordination, Game Theory, and the Law#269794
- Too much (and not enough) of a good thing: How agent neutral principles fail in prisoner's dilemmas#116292
- Recent advances in experimental studies of social dilemma games#17364
- A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation#6112
- A war of all against all? The close up problem#86860
Record · ID 726123
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive