PhilArchive
open access
Should the State Prohibit the Production of Artificial Persons?
This article argues that criminal law should not, in general, prevent the creation of artificially intelligent servants who achieve humanlike moral status, even though it may well be immoral to construct such beings. In defending this claim, a series of thought experiments intended to evoke clear intuitions is proposed, and presuppositions about any particular theory of criminalization or any particular moral theory are kept to a minimum.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Philosophical Signposts for Artificial Moral Agent Frameworks#702698
- More Human Than All Too Human: Challenges in Machine Ethics for Humanity Becoming a Spacefaring Civilization#77343
- Toward a Legal and Ethical Framework for Synthetic Intelligence Personhood#710018
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE LAW: THE CHALLENGES OF ESTABLISHING CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN THE DIGITAL AGE#1176723
- Human Dignity as High Moral Status#773450
Record · ID 726212
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive