PhilArchive
open access
Deferentialism and the Territory of Philosophy
David Liggins and Chris Daly have argued against a recent trend in which some philosophical debate or other is said to be settled by claims from a discipline other than philosophy, because claims from that discipline entail a position on the debate and any claims from that discipline have greater authority than any philosophical claims when the aim is to extend our knowledge. They label this trend deferentialism. This paper presents a dilemma for their argument.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Pragmatic accounts of justification, epistemic analyticity, and other routes to easy knowledge of abstracta#79636
- Lyotard, 'The Differend', and the Philosophy of Deep Disagreement#17628
- The Structure of Justification#76957
- Outsourcing Concepts: Deference, the Extended Mind, and Expanding our Epistemic Capacity#757966
- Transcendental Arguments, Conceivability, and Global Vs. Local Skepticism#754242
Record · ID 726318
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive