PhilArchive
open access
Its many varieties: does liberalism merely alternate between ethics and economics?
I am not sure who said that liberalism merely alternates between ethics and economics – was it Karl Kraus? – but at first glance the claim is plausible. In this paper I argue that there are varieties of liberalism which do not. Some depend on a nature-culture distinction and some appeal to simplicity in a way that seems aesthetic. In the appendix I introduce a problem for utilitarianism.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Neo-Aristotelian Naturalism, Local Ethical Supervenience, and the Beneficial Character of Virtue#83238
- Consistent Vegetarianism and the Suffering of Wild Animals#768445
- Ethics after Darwin: Completing the Revolution#725458
- Naturalistic ethics. Is there such a thing?#117114
- Rethinking a 1970s Timeline for a History of Enviornmental Ethics#75149
Record · ID 726341
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive