PhilArchive
open access
Imperfect-recall, evidential partition, and Monty Hall
Philosophical arguments for the rationality of Bayesian conditioning often use assumptions and concepts from epistemic logic without fully explicating them. In this work, we present a general dynamic epistemic logic framework to analyze logical properties of (Bayesian) learning scenarios. We argue that Perfect-Recall is an important epistemic principle at the heart of the project of justifying Bayesian conditioning. In such epistemic logic formulation, Perfect-Recall is not really about memory, but about the agent’s general ability to know how they came to know what they know. Following the existing literature, we use Monty Hall style cases to demonstrate the connection between PerfectRecall and the commitments of Bayesian conditioning.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Anti-Luck Epistemologies and Necessary Truths#763810
- Epistemic causality and its application to the social and cognitive sciences#730282
- Counterfactual knowability revisited#765874
- Knowing-how, showing, and epistemic norms#738412
- New Essays on the Knowability Paradox#701755
Record · ID 726852
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive