PhilArchive
open access
You Don't Have to be Better to Blame
It is widely held that hypocrites lack standing to blame. Leading accounts explain this by reference to some fault of the hypocritical blamer, such as a rejection of the equality of persons or insufficient commitment to the relevant norm. Recently, however, some theorists have rejected these fault-based accounts in favor of a novel proposal: having the standing to blame another individual requires being better than them with respect to the relevant norm. We argue that extant defenses of these “be better” accounts fail, and such accounts face a host of objections that cast doubt on their truth.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Contours of Blame#711335
- Blaming for Unreasonableness: Accountability without Ill Will#89033
- Two Problems of Self-Blame for Accounts of Moral Standing#735111
- Review Essay: A Deeper Understanding of Moral Standing#72364
- Forgiveness: Overcoming versus Forswearing Blame#77283
Record · ID 726927
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive