PhilArchive
open access
Replacing Truth?
In general, a reasonable method in philosophy is to replace an ordinary concept we actually use with a replacement concept better suited for theoretical purposes. But sometimes, due to features specific to the matter at hand, such replacement strategies are problematic. In this chapter, problems regarding the idea of replacing the concept of truth by an improved concept are discussed. Special attention is paid to the consequences of so‐called inconsistency theories of truth. A number of theorists including this chapter’s author have recently argued that the concept of truth is inconsistent. But considerations are presented here to the effect that even if the concept of truth is inconsistent, the idea of replacing it is not well motivated.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Truth in Fiction, Impossible Worlds, and Belief Revision#700926
- Empirical Studies on Truth and the Project of Re‐engineering Truth#97965
- Is Everything Revisable?#698664
- Does Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem Prove that Truth Transcends Proof?#775561
- On the Value of Reformulating#109199
Record · ID 727223
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive