PhilArchive
open access
The Fine-Tuning Argument and the Requirement of Total Evidence
According to the Fine-Tuning Argument, the existence of life in our universe confirms the Multiverse Hypothesis. A standard objection to FTA is that it violates the Requirement of Total Evidence. I argue that RTE should be rejected in favor of the Predesignation Requirement, according to which, in assessing the outcome of a probabilistic process, we should only use evidence characterizable in a manner available before observing the outcome. This produces the right verdicts in some simple cases in which RTE leads us astray, and, when applied to FTA, it shows that our evidence does confirm HM.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Multiple Universes and Self-Locating Evidence#741773
- A Defence of Metaphysical Naturalism - Addressing the flaws in the Fine Tuning Argument#75013
- Are Different Standards Warranted to Evaluate Psi?#777174
- Ceteris Paribus Laws: A Naturalistic Account#746099
- Limitation, Totality, and Structural Utility: A Field-Test Analysis of the Architecture of Limitation Against the Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe (CTMU)#118334
Record · ID 727626
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive