Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

The Paradox of Serotonergic Over-Prescription: A Comparative Analysis of Long-Term Antidepressant Dependency vs. Benzodiazepine Maintenance in Non-Depressive Anxiety Phenotypes

Sipes Jr, Michael Dale
PhilArchive · Papers
Open Source ↗
philosophy
The contemporary psychopharmacological paradigm exhibits a profound epistemic and systemic bias favoring selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) as first-line modalities for isolated anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), irrespective of an absent depressive baseline. This thesis challenges this clinical consensus through a iatrogenic and neurophilosophical critique, demonstrating that the off-label imposition of serotonergic agents on non-depressed brains introduces pathological biological friction, acute neurological activation, and an iatrogenic discontinuation syndrome that medically and volatilely exceeds the withdrawal parameters of traditional GABAergic agents. Utilizing an N-of-1 single-subject case design methodology, this paper constructs a conceptual model around distinct neurological phenotypes, exploring how structural alterations (such as post-traumatic brain injury mechanical shifts) isolate hyper-arousal into a purely somatic, hyper-adrenergic loop. We apply a rigorous neuropharmacological analysis to the mechanism of differential tolerance, establishing that while central receptor systems downregulate sedative actions rapidly, anxiolytic efficacy remains stable and preserved long-term without requiring dose escalation. Conversely, chronic antidepressant use introduces a profound chemical overlay linked to permanent limbic flattening, executive cognitive decline, and a protracted withdrawal syndrome that severely threatens cognitive safety and intellectual autonomy. Ultimately, this work provides a framework for the de-stigmatization of long-term benzodiazepine maintenance, arguing that for non-depressive autonomic phenotypes, targeted GABAergic stabilization possesses superior neurobiological integrity, bioethical alignment, and clinical utility over the algorithmic uniformity of modern antidepressant over-prescription.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 728372
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive