PhilArchive
open access
Bacup: why do fieldwork there?
Jeanette Edwards did fieldwork in the English town of Bacup. Why do fieldwork there? She writes that she is often asked this, whereas the question is unlikely to be asked of an anthropologist who does fieldwork in Papua New Guinea, because it is “axiomatically” an acceptable place for fieldwork. I present two responses to Edwards’ thinking, one of which concerns an asymmetry in how “skeptics” present their questions.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- On the distribution of why-fieldwork-there questions#97211
- A problem with detecting problem-solving outside the natural sciences#729813
- Exploration and Exploitation in Scientific Inquiry: Towards a Society of Explorers#743551
- The La Brea Tar Pits: a field trip & self-study guide; understanding the past & critical thinking#169276
- Learning in Lithic Landscapes: A Reconsideration of the Hominid “Toolmaking” Niche#740119
Record · ID 728806
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive