Comparison of two ridiculous fascists: Carl Schmitt and Wyndham Lewis

I draw attention to four differences between Carl Schmitt and Wyndham Lewis: (A) Schmitt characterizes certain war-mongering liberals as naive and Lewis characterizes them as wicked; (B) Schmit is not aware of the thought of running an authoritarian regime with a liberal surface, but Lewis is; (C) Schmitt, unlike Lewis, allocates no role to divinity in protecting the ways of a nation; and (D) Lewis is prepared to resign himself to the end of a nation’s way of life but Schmitt is not. (There is no fascism category, so I have placed this in the closest one to that.)