PhilArchive
open access
Right to Marry: Analytical and Normative Account
[The file provided is a detailed abstract] Should the answer to the ‘what is marriage?’ question guide us on what we can regulate as marriage? This is important for determining what we want marriage to be and how we can make it more just. Some argue that we should move towards a marriage-free regime where personal relationships are recognized, but the rights are not bundled under the legal institution of marriage. However, the acolytes of the Received View about the right to marry claim that the legal institution of marriage is essential to this right. This raises a philosophical question of whether our normative projects are limited by what legal marriage currently is.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- THE LEGAL STANDING OF MARRIAGE AND ITS SOCIAL ROLES IN SOCIETY#187153
- The Purpose of Marriage: A Multi-Perspective Exploration#721887
- Teaching “Against Marriage," or, "But, Professor, marriage isn't a contract!"#757332
- The Validity Of Inter-Religious Marriages: A Fiqh And Positive Law Perspective#201527
- “When Form Pretends to Be Substance”: The Ontology of Marriage Validity in Zambian Law#16534
Record · ID 729221
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive