PhilArchive
open access
Moral Justification
A central project in epistemology is to spell out the conditions under which a belief is epistemically justified. By contrast, ethicists have not given much attention to the conditions under which an action is morally justified. This state of affairs is surprising, given the way we use the term “justified” in everyday discourse. This paper argues that the concept of moral justification has an important role to play in ethics—a role that closely parallels the role epistemic justification plays in epistemology. After articulating this role, I take some first steps towards providing a unified theory of moral and epistemic justification. Along the way, I highlight the theoretical payoff of adding moral justification to our conceptual toolkit.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Introduction: Virtue's Reasons#701607
- The Composite Nature of Epistemic Justification#768027
- Responsibility Beyond Belief: The Epistemic Condition on Moral Responsibility#711311
- Morality Does Not Encroach#699104
- Consequentialism and Reasons for Action#96335
Record · ID 729298
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive