Metaphysical Justice and the Monopoly of Revelation: The Atheist Position's Dilemma of Injustice

This article examines a fundamental paradox faced by the atheist worldview: the contradiction of taking a strong stance against injustice while rejecting the metaphysical mechanisms that would make absolute justice possible. The study proves that this irresolvable contradiction supports the belief in a single God with both negative (atheist inconsistency) and positive (monopoly of revelation) arguments. The article analyzes two main arguments: (1) the thesis of "the acceptance of absolute injustice" as a logical consequence of the atheist position, and (2) the evidence for the existence of metaphysical powers through the phenomenon of monopoly in the tradition of revelation. The research supports this hypothesis by using historical analysis of revelation, the theory of power dynamics, and an epistemological approach that updates beliefs with evidence.