PhilArchive
open access
Sequenziamento genomico neonatale: quali interessi considerare nella definizione del pannello di geni?
Newborn screening is a publicly funded test aimed at identifying genetic diseases in healthy infants where early diagnosis can lead to timely and effective clinical intervention. Recently, there has been growing interest in applying genomic sequencing, in particular Whole Genome Sequencing and Whole Exome Sequencing, to this screening, significantly increasing the number of identifiable conditions. Considering the promises of this approach and the specificity of genomic data, some have suggested that newborn sequencing could serve the interests of not only screened newborns but also their parents, relatives, and even society. Determining which interests should legitimately be considered in genomic newborn sequencing is crucial for defining which genes to include in the gene panel of neonatal genomic screening. Stemming from a bioethical perspective, this paper discusses which interests should be considered in newborn sequencing, what the implications are for gene panel definition, and what conflicts between interests might emerge. Specifically, the newborn clinical interest, the reproductive interest, the family clinical interest, personal utility, and social utility will be considered.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Application of Spectral Methods to Assess Gametes, Embryos, and Human Reproductive Capabilities#843660
- Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of food allergy and IgE sensitization / Lisa Maier, Yidan Sun, Jaanika Kronberg, Erik Abner, Kayesha Coley, Ingo Marenholz, Stefan Weiss, Ronja Foraita, Tarik Karramass, Juha Mykkänen, Natalia Hernandez-Pacheco, Carol A. Wang, Negusse T. Kitaba, Sonali Pechlivanis, Emmanuelle Bouzigon, Casper E. Tingskov Pedersen, Ann-Marie M. Schoos, John Curtin, Sara Kress, Alba Hernangomez-Laderas, Francesco Foppiano, Sarah Ashley, Chiara Batini, Luke Bryant, Georg Homuth, Christian Gieger, Stefanie Gilles, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Suvi Rovio, Katja Pahkala, Raphaël Vernet, Rudolph Valenta, Sabrina Llop, Maties Torrent, Andreas Böck, Mimi L. K. Tang, Carsten B. Schmidt-Weber, Andres Metspalu, Tõnu Esko, Aline B. Sprikkelman, Catherine John, Young-Ae Lee, Kirsten Beyer, Henry Völzke, Iris Pigeot, Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann, Liesbeth Duijts, Haojie Lu, Olli T. Raitakari, Terho Lehtimäki, Mika Kähönen, Chris H. L. Tio, Erik Melén, Craig E. Pennell, John W. Holloway, Erika von Mutius, Valérie Siroux, Klaus Bønnelykke, Adnan Custovic, Angela Simpson, Tamara Schikowski, Jose Ramon Bilbao, Bianca Schaub, Rachel Peters, Elin T. G. Kersten, Judith M. Vonk, Elisabeth Thiering, Annette Peters, Gerard H. Koppelman, Marie Standl#783953
- Biotechnology and naturalness in the genomics era: Plotting a timetable for the biotechnology debate#779020
- Attitudes of professional stakeholders towards implementation of reproductive genetic carrier screening: a systematic review#147414
- Development of a question prompt list to support Consent for Genomic Testing (CoGenT) and research.#223205
Record · ID 729445
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive