PhilArchive
open access
The Scientism Debate: A Battle for the Soul of Philosophy?
In this paper, I report the results of an empirical study, which was designed to test the following hypotheses: (H1) Many philosophers find scientism threatening because they see it as a threat to the future of philosophy as a major in colleges and universities; (H2) Many philosophers find scientism threatening because they see it as a threat to the soul or essence of philosophy as an a priori discipline. My results provide some empirical evidence in support of H2. These results are also in line with the results of other empirical studies that point to a methodological shift in philosophy from the armchair to the laboratory.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- How Not to Criticise Scientism#739958
- Toward Philosophy of Science’s Social Engagement#708302
- Epistemologia delle scienze sociali#712759
- The New Sociology of Science as the Foundation of the Epistemic Process: A Coherence–Persistence Rereading of Auguste Comte#28940
- The New Sociology of Science as the Foundation of the Epistemic Process: A Coherence–Persistence Rereading of Auguste Comte#28939
Record · ID 729582
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive