Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

Sex, medicine, and moralization

Hooven, Carole et al. · 2026
PhilArchive · Papers · 2026
Open Source ↗
philosophy
Over the last century, biologists have come to know much more about the two sexes, but they have not seen any need to revise the traditional binary “gametic” account of sex. One would expect that medical controversies would take place against a background of agreement on the sex binary. Recent cultural trends have dashed that expectation. What changed was not science, but politics: the new century’s push for transgender rights sowed doubts about the sex binary, making sex-classification in law, education, sport, and medicine highly controversial. This article explores the manifestation of these cultural trends in academia and medicine, which has been to the detriment of medical standards and the well-being of patients. An instructive case study is the area of medicine in which the hegemony of non-binarism has been most dramatic: the treatment of people—including minors—suffering from gender distress.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 729834
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive