PhilArchive
open access
Recognition and Recruitment in Overt Code Dogwhistles
In her most recent book, Jennifer Saul suggests that overt code dogwhistles can function as recruitment tools for wild conspiracism and blatant racism insofar as they can be used to co-opt the existing legitimate interests of potential recruits. I show that this claim is true of only a particular subset of overt code dogwhistles: only polysemous codes can recruit. All other overt codes, including homonymous codes and nonsense codes, can do little more than allow existing followers to recognize one another under the radar in public.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- HybridCodeAuthorship: A Benchmark Dataset for Line-Level Code Authorship Detection#271917
- Algorithmic Political Bias Can Reduce Political Polarization#90216
- Russian as a Lingua Franca in a Security Cooperation Context: Designing Career-Oriented Language Training Programs#356416
- IndicTriMix: Developing Language Identification Datasets and Models for Tri-Language Code-Mixing#999532
- From Helpful to Trustworthy: LLM Agents for Pair Programming#10449
Record · ID 730448
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive