PhilArchive
open access
The Ritual Infrastructure of Conversation
I sketch a theory of small talk’s structure and function. Small talk enables us to “get to know each other” not through what we say to each other but through the way we conform to social practices in saying it. Through small talk, we indirectly generate evidence about the nature of our underlying practical agency. I show why my analysis predicts small talk’s most striking structural features. I then distinguish between two types of questions: questions about what interlocutors aim to do within a conversational genre and questions about what a conversational genre aims to do. Analytic philosophers of language have ignored the second type of questions. This paper demonstrates their importance.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reimagining Illocutionary Force#752172
- The ethnography of communication#341348
- Interreligious Dialogue: the Christian Brothers and their Pedagogy of Love for the Oppressed#694565
- Cultural Quiet Signals : The Unspoken Language of Human Behavior / Ensieh Khosroshahi#629238
- Conversations - improvised counterpoint#336354
Record · ID 730637
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive