PhilArchive
open access
Defending the link between ethical veganism and antinatalism
In my paper recently published in a collection of controversial arguments in this journal, I argued that the same principles that are behind ethical veganism also warrant antinatalist conclusions. I thus suggested that to be consistent in their ethical reasoning, moral vegans should not have children. William Bülow has kindly responded to my claims and offered a plausible reply, which, according to him, concludes that at least some moral vegans may resist antinatalism. In this short paper, I reply to Bülow.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Biting the bullet on ethical veganism, antinatalism, and the demands of morality#87209
- Can ‘eugenics’ be defended?#715159
- Anti-natalist ethics and their broader moral significance#91803
- Review of Gary L. Comstock, Vexing Nature? On the Ethical Case Against Agricultural Biotechnology#772930
- Review of Gary L. Comstock, Vexing Nature? On the Ethical Case against Agricultural Biotechnology#772161
Record · ID 730747
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive